Somewhere in the remote region, the war ends. In the midst of ruined cities and houses in the streets, in rural hamlets, everywhere where people still live, are children who have lost their homes and parents. Abandoned, hungry, and in rags, defenseless and humiliated, they wander through the world. Hunger drives them. Little streams of orphans merge into a river which rushes forward and submerges everything in its path. The children do not know any feeling; they know only the world of their enemies. They fight, steal, struggle for a mouthful of food, and violence is merely a means to get it. A gang led by Cahoun finds a refuge in an abandoned castle and encounters an old composer who has voluntarily retired into solitude from a world of hatred, treason, and crime. How can they find a common ground, how can they become mutual friends? The castle becomes their hiding place but possibly it will also be their first home which they may organize and must defend. But even for this, the price will be very high.
To this simple story, the journalist, writer, poet, scriptwriter, movie director, and film theoretician Béla Balázs applied many years of experience. He and the director Géza Radványi created a work which opened a new postwar chapter in Hungarian film. Surprisingly, this film has not lost any of its impact over the years, especially on a profound philosophical level. That is to say, it is not merely a movie about war; it is not important in what location and in what period of time it takes place. It is a story outside of time about the joyless fate of children who pay dearly for the cruel war games of adults.
At the time it was premiered, the movie was enthusiastically received by the critics. The main roles were taken by streetwise boys of a children's group who created their roles improvisationally in close contact with a few professional actors, and in the children's acting their own fresh experience of war's turmoil appears to be reflected. At the same time, their performance fits admirably into the mosaic of a very complex movie language. Balázs's influence revealed itself, above all, in the introductory sequences: an air raid on an amusement park, seen in a montage of dramatic situations evoking the last spasms of war, where, undoubtedly, we discern the influence of classical Soviet cinematography. Shooting, the boy's escape, the locomotive's wheels, the shadows of soldiers with submachine guns, the sound of a whistle—the images are linked together in abrupt sequences in which varying shots and expressive sharp sounds are emphasized. A perfectly planned screenplay avoided all elements of sentimentality, time-worn stereotypes of wronged children, romanticism and cheap simplification. The authors succeeded in bridging the perilous dramatic abyss of the metamorphosis of a children's community. Their telling of the story (the scene of pillaging, the assault on the castle, etc) independently introduced some neorealist elements which, at that time, were being propagated in Italy by De Sica, Rossellini, and other film artists. The rebukes of contemporary critics, who called attention to "formalism for its own sake" have been forgotten. The masterly art of cameraman Barnabás Hegyi gives vitality to the poetic images. His angle shots of the children, his composition of scenes in the castle interior, are a living document of the times, and underline the atmosphere and the characters of the protagonists. The success of the picture was also enhanced by the musical art of composer Dénes Buday who, in tense situations, inserted the theme of the Marseilaise into the movie's structure, as a motive of community unification, as an expression of friendship and the possibility of understanding.
Valahol Europaban is the first significant postwar Hungarian film. It originated in a relaxed atmosphere, replete with joy and euphoria, and it includes these elements in order to demonstrate the strength of humanism, tolerance, and friendship. It represents a general condemnation of war anywhere in the world, in any form.
做好事，无愧自己，无愧他人。
7.5飞机上 就，很流水账。。比我自己写的东西还不忍卒读 但主演和演Leslie那位都很努力+1星
拍成这样真的不如做成一部纪录片全部用真实影像更真诚。
作为传记电影是不足的，没有达到预期，但对梅艳芳真的极尽怜爱。
故事碎片化，更像是梅艳芳逸闻录。王丹妮模仿得算够像了吧，但角色整体还是单薄。再就是张国荣选角有点油了。此外减分点还有无节制滥用柔光特效和复古滤镜，以及一些塑料质感的出戏布景。
拍的非常浅，人物性格根本没立起来，梅姐的性格都被纪录影像支撑着，只要回到演员就很尴尬，Leslie 如果不冠名Leslie真看不出他跟哥哥有什么关系，以及两人友情也完全没有展开深入
电影的深度不够，更像一部影像式记录电影，主要介绍了梅姐的一些重要节点，新秀歌唱大赛，红馆演唱会，胭脂扣，审死官，KTV打耳光，包括最后谢幕夕阳之歌。。电影亮点在于王丹妮的表演还是很有梅姐形的，歌不错，古天乐很帅。。缺点在于作为电影剧情张力不够，哥哥的选角是一大败笔。另外如果是梅姐粉丝可能觉得太简化。作为不是梅姐粉丝的我还是让我更了解这位香港女儿，致敬双栖天后梅艳芳！
5.5 传奇人物传记难免变成PPT,但这部至少还是CINEMA
从立项就开始关注
拍的太苦了，应该压缩苦情戏份，更多展示阿姐芳华绝代的一面。
［院］最后一段婚纱《夕阳之歌》还是挺感动的，女主还是挺神似的。Leslie的选角挺令人失望，完全像是一个需要存在的工具人。
其实，这部电影又何尝不是文艺界的《长津湖》呢？感动的不是电影，而是那个人、那些人。
4 除了对近藤真彦化名化处理及美化之外，其他并没有什么不适之处，毕竟影片是对梅姑的一个回忆，一篇传记，而不是其他什么。但是我觉得应该适当加大对梅姑姐妹的刻画，以及梅姑和张国荣之间友情的刻画，另外张国荣的演员选的也太不像本人了。电影采取了一种最原始的平铺直叙，直白的把整个经过给表现出来，但后半部分尤其是接近高潮的时候还是很容易让人落泪的，不喧宾夺主，不过度煽情，不跳戏串戏，以及适当的还原当年的名场面以及用真实的纪录原样代替真人出场的形式，其实影片做的已经挺好的了。最后的夕阳之歌很应景，为影片做了一个还算行的，直白普遍的谢幕。
这是第一次从头哭到尾并且很多人一起落泪的电影。电影开头和结束，梅姐那句“我舍不得”，我哭了好久...
成名前比成名后有趣，但仍有好多有趣的点没有展现出来，现实还是要比电影精彩得多，这是创作的失败。梅艳芳的选角尚可圈可点，演员也足够投入，就算不是十全十美也不留遗憾了，张国荣的选角则是大灾难，身边的工具人则个个伟光正，仿佛要响起《让世界充满爱》的配乐，但更适合她的应该是《血染的风采》吧——她自己唱的那个版本。
传记片还是很有吸引力的一个类型，但不知道是不是拍真人真事会各种麻烦，所以国内传记片比较少。这部《梅艳芳》基本还是面向大众，而非资深乐迷，面面俱到讲了她的一生，亲情、爱情、友情、走红、低谷、音乐、电影、慈善、抗癌，有点流水账，如果是好莱坞冲奥片可能就只拍告别演唱会倒计时穿插闪回之类的。当然了，这也不是冲奥片，有这样一部周全的商业片来纪念梅艳芳、纪念曾经的香港，还是有意义的吧。因为梅艳芳的时代离现在观众还比较近，所以还是可以很好地代入，对真实人物的情感能够弥补影片叙事上的平庸。关于选角，既然主创都下这么大力气找到王丹妮，特训了半年，为什么不也多花点工夫找个更神似的张国荣？既然不用特型演员或特效化妆，做不到形似，那至少也得抓点神韵吧，梅艳芳还是有点神似的。王丹妮脸像身型不像，应该尽量少给全身镜头。
今天的香港娱乐圈竟然凑不出钱拍梅姐。
很感动能看到纪念一位香港传奇巨星的故事，梅艳芳传奇的一生因为这部影片也让现在的观众能够去熟悉她，记得她。整部影片有很多的成功之处，王丹妮挑起大梁可以说非常成功！但影片也有很多的遗憾。比起国外的人物传记片，最好的对标影片应该是让玛丽昂·歌蒂娅在2008年摘得奥斯卡影后的《玫瑰人生》，《梅艳芳》相比之下就成了一部香港国宝的“政府宣传片”，成了香港的任长霞、李素丽。太多新闻背后的故事都没有被挖掘，真正的人生故事被一笔草草带过，反而好似当红红二代一般，被伪光正一般树立起来，没让人看到一个真正、立体的梅艳芳。试想如果有一天我们内地人拍红二代《韩雪》，可能也就是这样吧，如果是因为梅艳芳的传记片拍的太早，希望未来几十年之内，不要让我看到这样宣传纪录片一样的《张国荣》，甚至《郑秀文》。
还是那个问题 情动机制在于召唤肉身 就像替身演员只能拍远景和背影 你无法用他们替代本尊 如果要替代 也要找一个量级的 比如当年用顾冠忠替徐少强 不然 你还真当观众是皮格马利翁呐？
17'选秀经理林家栋登场
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
