Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
这部有社会派推理的元素，但是感觉不够蜡笔小新啊！
春日部防卫队，fire！！！
青春的风景很美好，但赋予他们意义的是我们携手走过留下的痕迹
看一个蜡笔小新剧场版哭了好几次，这都正常吗？但是好燃啊！！渐入佳境的故事。
Crayon.Shinchan.Shrouded.in.Mystery.The.Flowers.of.Tenkazu.Academy.2021.1080p.BluRay.x264-WiKi
但是谁都知道以后的事变数太多，所以小新才要大声骂回去：要活在当下啊。
老大和妮妮学姐超帅的！
想成为精英，更想跟你一直在一起！朋友啊！青春是此时此刻！真是太可爱了
青春就是，你想去做什么的时候就去做什么！形形色色的人，形状各异的青春！
最主要的是青春这一主题，青春是什么？
蜡笔小新剧场版一般都不会差，立意非常好，从来没有真正的坏人，“一个只有精英才会得到优待，而弱者就如同蝼蚁一样，真是个让人窒息的地方。”马拉松的感人之处我就不说了，我想说：“大哥，你真帅啊，虽然你的脸和身体完全不违和，但你，真帅。”
青春是无限可能性，为了朋友而努力奋斗的春日部防卫队是最棒的！这就是青春😭
真好哇，轻飘飘地带出如鸡娃教育或阶层差异之类的深刻话题，又轻飘飘地放下，还是以情动人，看到后面竟然默默流下一行泪，黯然销魂不过如此鹅。还是那么无厘头笑点全都能get，新风糖分超标竟还是双向奔赴，如果这都不算爱555！青春什么，是假面，是恋爱，是闪闪发亮，是自卑感，是后悔，是人情世故，是孤独，是欢呼，是曾经拥有，是此时此刻，是奔跑的激情555555fire！
青春是曾经拥有，是就在当下，是自备感，是爱自己，是爱那些无意义的事物，是fire！春日部防卫队的友情真好啊，结尾马拉松太燃又好哭
！！！33代也太帅了叭！！！还有这次这部新风真的太好磕了，风间是真的很认真的想要跟他们一直在一起的，但是他真的想法太多反而会很累啊……
当风间想成为精英，怎么看待身边不思进取的伙伴？“春日部小队是暂时的，我们终于有一天要分道扬镳啊” “所以才要享受当下！” “那就等我成为精英之后，我们再一决胜负吧！” 关于青春中的悔恨、冲劲、迷茫...批判了唯分数第一的普世价值。搞笑的小桥段不少。
有些人设和之前根本不一样，感觉更像是个披着蜡笔小新皮的其他故事。再吐槽一下，犯人明明应该是爱干净的，但导演为了误导人还是让他邋遢地留下了证物。
无论是怎样的青春，都希望他们有一天可以笑着回忆
青春啊！马拉松那段真的眼眶湿润，连小时候看的动画都开始赚眼泪了。“嘲笑努力的人会被秃鹰揪光头发”小新看起来不靠谱，但是他的心是精英～
近十年来最棒的「蜡笔小新」剧场版！活在当下，青春，Fire！！！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
