剧情介绍

  Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.

评论:

  • 芝涵 3小时前 :

    首先,我不赞同卖淫合法化。

  • 美馨 2小时前 :

    最后的演讲是高光

  • 雷慧雅 8小时前 :

    有被惊艳到,无论是女主的演技、剧情的编排、还是片中的歌舞。但片子未能说服的我是,为什么甘古拜在从被骗卖身到大权在握之后,要求的竟然是卖y合法化。她说要求杏工作者及其后代跟普通公民一样,拥有同等的权利,尤其是受教育权。这点我完全支持。但是卖y合法化这个就看得我很迷。不正是这样拐卖妇女非法监禁强迫卖y的一条龙服务人为且系统地持续制造妓女、以及女性所受到的奴役和压迫吗?你可以要求群体的权利,可以歌颂个人的努力和奉献,但这普度众生的说辞摇身一变,变成要求吃人的产业合法化,我就不能理解了。比较俗套的设计还是成功靠男人拯救,被虐待靠黑帮大佬救援,要选举靠黑帮大佬拉关系,要出名靠男性记者做宣传。且不说这俩男配基本就是平面角色、动机不明,女主的爬升多多少少还是依靠了自己的媚男手段。还是不能免俗。

  • 桐玥 2小时前 :

    有幸看过,拿到桌子上拍这片子,画面整体布景给人一种很舒服的感觉

  • 那瑞锦 4小时前 :

    《要求xing工作合法化》才是点睛之笔,无论再怎么努力都无法改变

  • 汲飞莲 3小时前 :

    女主大有可为,但故事没有吸引力。看了好几周了,补一记。

  • 运天 6小时前 :

    PPS:支持卖淫合法化……赌博合法叫股票,毒品合法叫镇痛药,卖淫合法或许叫……自由。

  • 颛孙依楠 7小时前 :

    如果不能驱逐世上的黑暗,至少要往黑暗中注入光明。

  • 鲜于雅云 1小时前 :

    女主真的很美 是爽片 但是只有女主一个人美的现实还是很惨 不管怎么说电影胜过演讲这件事还是很爽

  • 谭梦菡 0小时前 :

    -

  • 遇宏胜 5小时前 :

    国情决定现实,改变不了大环境,但你可以选择在困局中斗争的权利。本片的立意放在现代社会或许有一定的局限性,但在彼地彼刻,已经是挣脱牢笼的存在。

  • 漫韵 5小时前 :

    1.女人出生在印度, 根本是抽到地獄模組的倒楣鬼 2.民主國家的優點是再怎麼骯髒不堪的醜事都有機會被攤開檢視, 宛如這部影片, 印度仍然是有值得尊敬的地方

  • 露初 9小时前 :

    不知道为什么评分这么低。但是确实是很好的电影,演员漂亮演技非常到位,故事原型真是偶像,不能被现实给击败,在现实给你的情况下,怎么样能做到最好。妓女该不该合法化一直会是一个争论的问题。当然我也觉得不应该让女生去当妓女,但是如果不合法化又将是带来怎么样的后果呢?感觉后果更加严重,让这些被拐卖的受害者更加失去了被法律保护的权利。捍卫女性的权利,捍卫自己的身边团体的权益是多么酷的事情。为什么整天却花时间纠结吃醋。等女性成为权利,财富,智慧的象征的时候,看男人哪里去找优越感。

  • 费浩思 3小时前 :

    女性意识觉醒但没有完全觉醒 比如为什么一下子就认命了 为什么大佬如此信赖女主帮她解决各种问题 为什么女主从政后不选择直接解放妓女而是主张要给妓女权利 为什么女主对贩卖她到妓院的初恋依然怀有情感 但印度拍出这种电影真的非常厉害了 当成爽片来看非常棒! 她不仅救赎了自己获得尊严 也拯救了成百上千的遭受苦难的女性//我承认前一段文字携带了太多偏见 我没有真正站在甘古拜的立场和印度的国情去看问题 对于她的言行过于挑剔

  • 芝涵 0小时前 :

    在印度这片土地上无需代入西方女权思想,在没有尊严的地方争取尊严,局限性是客观存在,也没必要过于指摘。

  • 浩暄 9小时前 :

    虽然大女主+女性主义让两个半小时看起来很爽,但还是希望能讲究一下逻辑问题,槽点无数,甘古拜富家千金说被卖窑子就被卖窑子,当个豪门女婿不比把女友卖80块人民币香?进来后说带全妓院罢工看电影就带女人们罢工看电影,有这个权利不如直接买张火车票回家去?被混混嫖客虐待选择告状他的大哥,大哥帮她出头还收做义妹,顶着大哥妹妹的名号在红灯区一路开挂,想起了黄晓明那部我打了两颗星的《大上海》,同样剧情,不知道哪来的一根葱莫名其妙被大佬罩住从此走向巅峰,不过好歹这部电影还有个好立意,本身也是根据小说改编,当无脑爽文可以。

  • 裕振 0小时前 :

    一个心中没有自己,却装着他人和天下的女人,注定是不败的,亦注定是孤独的。

  • 梦俊 2小时前 :

    玫瑰有很多颜色,我们可以是任何颜色。

  • 母云英 7小时前 :

    大女主啊大女主~

  • 许友卉 3小时前 :

    情绪上很饱满,但感觉还是更偏爽剧一点,女主遇到的困难以及她的解决办法就像大纲一样一笔带过。而且影片好像有意回避了一个政治人物的复杂性,也缺乏对于妓女苦难更多的展示,这些都让影片看起来在讲一个十分现实的故事,但又让人觉得有点悬浮,也缺乏应有的力度。到最后提出卖淫合法化的诉求,要么是女主本身确实并非只单纯为了妓女/女性着想,要么是出于当时环境下的妥协性策略,但是影片都没有铺垫,就让这个点显得非常别扭。就像她的那场演讲,明明她也是被迫做妓女,获取权力是为了不再做妓女也为了其他妓女生存的更好,但是怎么讲的内容是这个职业的必要性和身为妓女很骄傲,而不是指责逼迫女性卖淫的人、指出妓女的苦难、让人们停止迫害女性和已经成为妓女的人呢?这一点我确实没理解。ps:女主有点像坎妹,好爱里面的歌舞,爱情戏还蛮动人的

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved