You are never fully liberated from Auschwitz, 11 July 2016 Author: Red-125 from Upstate New York The French movie "À la vie" was shown in the U.S. with the translated title "To Life (2014)." It was written and directed by Jean-Jacques Zilbermann. The film is a Post-Holocaust saga, although it opens with scenes in Auschwitz that are truly horrific. Hélène (Julie Depardieu) and Lily (Johanna ter Steege) were friends in Auschwitz, and they managed to survive the death march from Auschwitz to Louslau together. A third friend, Rose (Suzanne Clément) was unable to walk, so they were forced to leave her behind. As it turned out, Rose survived until the liberation of Auschwitz. The three did not see each other again until 1962, when they come together for a reunion at a beachside resort in Northern France. We learn early in the movie that Lily divorced her husband after the war, and is living as a "free soul," with no permanent partner. Hélène and Rose both married concentration camp survivors. The plot of the film--based on the lives of three actual friends--revolves around their interactions during the reunion. No matter how much ice cream they eat, and how they display their new bathing suits, thoughts keep circling back to Auschwitz. They quarrel about tiny details which they remember differently. They revive horrible memories. It's clear that the reunion will change their lives, but whether the change will be for the better or for the worse is an open question. For reasons I don't understand, "To Life" caries a terrible IMDb rating of 6.1. Fortunately, we saw it as part of the excellent Rochester Jewish Film Festival. If we hadn't had "All-Event" tickets, we probably would have stayed home. This is a movie to be seen, not missed. Ignore the rating and seek it out. It's available on DVD, and it will work well on the small screen. See it!
另外性解放依然应该以道德和法律为基础，片子里探寻的道路太不符合现实了。
看到最后哭了，如果可以，我想打六🌟。最后双方都得到了救赎，印象深刻的一句话，you are not buying for fact, you are buying for fantasy,另外，男主真的是温柔的一个人啊
3.5。工整，固定场景，青春帅气的男鸭，和丧偶的白人中年妇女之间的四次交易。其实电影中很直白地表露出，最后男性性工作者引以为傲自己的职业，而这场金钱买来的肉体关系里，白人妇女是为了索求一个刺激，因为她这辈子除了丈夫以外没有第二个性爱。而她最后，是靠自己达到高潮。在这场无疾而终的交易关系里，男鸭只是她的摆渡人（正视衰老的魅力），而她又成了男鸭的激励者（正视童年创伤），遗憾的是，这里有非常浓厚的女性意淫和凝视——女性老去时，会买一个身材很好又体贴的男鸭，他还会照顾我们的情绪，甚至成为朋友。这一幕幕其实不过是一场金钱交易下的幻梦，男鸭永远擅长表演和讨好的，所以，探索风月时，它只用成为一个释怀和解压的工具，各取所需，不必强求一段关系。那么他们做到了。（男主身材长相确实很男模，算是让女孩们饱眼福了。）
一个没有过性高潮的女性是不完整的，这和“一个没有生过孩子的女性是不完整的”这种逻辑有什么两样。
表演、调度、剧本, 简洁又动人. 主题更不必说. 我要推荐给每一位女性朋友(还有个别男性友人)!
所有女性都应该重视自己 欣赏自己 掌握自己的身体与生命 thanks to you, Leo Grande
性圣人。性是很好的治疗剂。
从讨论性工作合法与否开始令人不适。剧本直到结尾都有点搞笑，我想也许是因为片中角色并不是妓女。另外，果然无论东西，老师都很爱用“荡妇”一词形容学生啊。
再次，力比多是生命之源啊，性满足后，人从想而不能的愁眉苦脸变得释放舒展。从小被主流社会价值观（宗教课，天主教教义，被社会和宗教内化的产物家庭观念）所压抑限制的是人性本源的动力，伊甸园本来就playground of delight。
结局太俗了，嫖客就喜欢人生救赎，不分男女；还不如老阿姨逐渐变态，两个人弄死一个呢。
小品。当个下午茶看了挺舒适的，笑笑吃个爆米花就相互救赎happy ending了，但不能细想。比如underlying idea是不是：1虽然男主一直在重复每个人的身体都不一样，每个人的欲望也都不同，可是为什么最后仍以女主达到高潮作为全片高潮？是不是reinforce了高潮在性行为中作为目的也作为一个norm？2这一切的前提都是作为女性要有钱，有钱才可以雇人为你服务为你达到身体和心灵的解放，一切还是在一个资本驱动的结构之下。换句话说，女性只有有钱才能拥有自由，这是本片一切感人至深的救赎的前提。如果本片性别互换一下，一个老男人需要有钱才能达到性和心灵的解放吗？no。只能说和急着包鸭的所有评论遥相呼应了。我们的性高潮竟被资本如此隐秘地控制着。（中间一大段speech要求pc合法我也是醉了
剧本、演员和调度好到，就算充满了标签化的表达，还是忍不住非常、非常的入戏！男主太迷人了！
女导演，女性题材！保守老太太喜迎第二春的故事。室内剧，单一场景，大密度对话，执行流畅、稳健，全靠表演交流，每一次会面两人的心理和生理推进有层次感。艾玛·汤普森影后预定。
艾玛汤普森大胆的表演，值得她在今年的颁奖季拿下奖杯，影片全靠对话来推进精致的剧情，又不让觉得老套，勇敢的探寻了少有前人探索的题材，不必为衰老的肉体和容颜的伤身，也别羞于谈性，性能带来的快乐，overrated but necessary。如果说有什么流俗的地方，其实还是，如果不加那一点点的感情，编剧也怕观众接受不了纯粹的性。
大失所望。➊假；➋狭隘；➌酸腐；➍势利。
看前二十分钟: 不会就是单一场景吧... 最后十分钟: ok!! 最make sense和empowering的全裸镜头 以及男主也实在是太帅了
They didn't do 69.
Leo the sex worker claims he can put up a fantasy, and he delivered. But I think the screenwriter did a better job on that.
倒是想起之前和ex睡前睡后并肩坐在床上的对话，那些沮丧的、欢欣的、诚实的、矫饰的、难解的、无法重演的。
一二次约会的紧张小心翼翼拍的挺动人，但转而三四次约会又落入原生家庭、自我和解的窠臼。主题是accept yourself，accept your body仅仅是几句台词以及结尾一笔带过，要是对accept our body的探讨多一些也许会更喜欢。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
