Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
3.国内找不出一个如此的肌肉男演员，确实汗颜。
各种慢镜头开挂的双人阿三组合，抗英阿三，战狼阿三。
基情满满哈哈哈哈哈。虽然十分夸张但是拍的很有趣，舞的场面，两个男主跳的很好，打斗场面一开始就不讲逻辑，后面就是打的很好，逻辑是什么不重要。重要的是我们的兄弟情和理想。
剧情硬伤太多，不过确实好看也好玩，只是结尾太尬了必须扣分，前面说了半天要获得武器，结果一拿弓箭瞬间化身罗摩，开启神话模式，而且居然开开心心回家跳舞了，更不要说印度民族英雄英国傻白甜了，这样要能摆脱英国真是纯粹靠运气
有病？
两个人是一支队伍，虽然很无厘头，但是特效，爽剧，还是很可以的。
特效夸张，神力无边，不过这种荷尔蒙的电影看起来确实代感呀，看看人家的爱国电影，作为一个外国人都觉得热血沸腾，难怪票房高了。
印度版《战狼》，娱乐爽片，浮夸的很，各种，各种花式开挂，印度人都这么自恋这么尬嘛！
这个《RRR》是直男观看得爽片，双男主，一个惹辱负重为了革命成为了猎狗，一个为了救回妹子成为了猎人。“一见钟情”、心心相惜，经历了枪林弹雨、忍辱背叛、生死相伴，天选之子的两位大神打败了英国殖民者们
本来是纽约提喻法或改编剧本的潜力，结果并不似预期，但是起码也让大家开心，凯奇真是有着影史上最奇幻职业生涯的影帝。
封控最后一天，看看阿三的开挂片，图一乐也不错。
水神火神联手干掉日不落 虽然不是搞笑片但真的好欢乐 各种夸张的动作和神奇的药效让人惊讶 双人合一 水火战神 刀枪不入
阿三的革命起义神片 不过你别说 剧情、人物、舞美、运镜都做得挺到位的
我真是看得太满足了。虽然有些情节略显幼稚和简单，但还是想推荐。太棒了。
这个《RRR》是直男观看得爽片，双男主，一个惹辱负重为了革命成为了猎狗，一个为了救回妹子成为了猎人。“一见钟情”、心心相惜，经历了枪林弹雨、忍辱背叛、生死相伴，天选之子的两位大神打败了英国殖民者们
印度电影一如既往的热闹，夸张，特色鲜明。不过，总体很好，歌曲很好听，故事线也还完整
被殖民国家总是有点神剧异禀的应激反应，子弹呼呼冒着火星子都能打出原子弹的威力，哦，别忘了跳舞…
6.5/10 分。初看，蓝光。整体普普通通吧，前面还有点意思，后面就烂俗了。。。本来我还以为他有可能是直接做了一个梦的，哈哈。。。
印度电影真的是艺术太高于生活了😅😅😅不过好在“逻辑自洽”
印度抗英神剧。一边被鞭打一边还能唱歌真是忍不住笑了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
