Somewhere in the remote region, the war ends. In the midst of ruined cities and houses in the streets, in rural hamlets, everywhere where people still live, are children who have lost their homes and parents. Abandoned, hungry, and in rags, defenseless and humiliated, they wander through the world. Hunger drives them. Little streams of orphans merge into a river which rushes forward and submerges everything in its path. The children do not know any feeling; they know only the world of their enemies. They fight, steal, struggle for a mouthful of food, and violence is merely a means to get it. A gang led by Cahoun finds a refuge in an abandoned castle and encounters an old composer who has voluntarily retired into solitude from a world of hatred, treason, and crime. How can they find a common ground, how can they become mutual friends? The castle becomes their hiding place but possibly it will also be their first home which they may organize and must defend. But even for this, the price will be very high.
To this simple story, the journalist, writer, poet, scriptwriter, movie director, and film theoretician Béla Balázs applied many years of experience. He and the director Géza Radványi created a work which opened a new postwar chapter in Hungarian film. Surprisingly, this film has not lost any of its impact over the years, especially on a profound philosophical level. That is to say, it is not merely a movie about war; it is not important in what location and in what period of time it takes place. It is a story outside of time about the joyless fate of children who pay dearly for the cruel war games of adults.
At the time it was premiered, the movie was enthusiastically received by the critics. The main roles were taken by streetwise boys of a children's group who created their roles improvisationally in close contact with a few professional actors, and in the children's acting their own fresh experience of war's turmoil appears to be reflected. At the same time, their performance fits admirably into the mosaic of a very complex movie language. Balázs's influence revealed itself, above all, in the introductory sequences: an air raid on an amusement park, seen in a montage of dramatic situations evoking the last spasms of war, where, undoubtedly, we discern the influence of classical Soviet cinematography. Shooting, the boy's escape, the locomotive's wheels, the shadows of soldiers with submachine guns, the sound of a whistle—the images are linked together in abrupt sequences in which varying shots and expressive sharp sounds are emphasized. A perfectly planned screenplay avoided all elements of sentimentality, time-worn stereotypes of wronged children, romanticism and cheap simplification. The authors succeeded in bridging the perilous dramatic abyss of the metamorphosis of a children's community. Their telling of the story (the scene of pillaging, the assault on the castle, etc) independently introduced some neorealist elements which, at that time, were being propagated in Italy by De Sica, Rossellini, and other film artists. The rebukes of contemporary critics, who called attention to "formalism for its own sake" have been forgotten. The masterly art of cameraman Barnabás Hegyi gives vitality to the poetic images. His angle shots of the children, his composition of scenes in the castle interior, are a living document of the times, and underline the atmosphere and the characters of the protagonists. The success of the picture was also enhanced by the musical art of composer Dénes Buday who, in tense situations, inserted the theme of the Marseilaise into the movie's structure, as a motive of community unification, as an expression of friendship and the possibility of understanding.
Valahol Europaban is the first significant postwar Hungarian film. It originated in a relaxed atmosphere, replete with joy and euphoria, and it includes these elements in order to demonstrate the strength of humanism, tolerance, and friendship. It represents a general condemnation of war anywhere in the world, in any form.
也许我想看的是在某个平行世界中他们六个人过得怎么样了，而不是六位演员的你问我答。3.5星。
即便《老友記》從播完到現在每一年都會被各種洋蔥新聞拿出來消費一遍，我們也還是很樂於看到他們重聚。
没有任何感觉，就像看武林外传重聚一样，完全和我想象当中的不一样，我以为是剧里人物17年后重聚，没想到是客座形式的主创重聚。。。
Ross比戏里面帅很多，话也多很多，原来Joey的性格很好，菲比几乎没怎么变，还是那么美！Mon和Rachel是不是玻尿酸打的有点多……最爱的小钱钱话却是最少的，也是最显老的一个，可能也是经历最多的一个了。好几次看到落泪，人生短短数十载，最珍贵的还是不变的情谊和当初最真的心！
最后那段reread，还是眼泪掉下来。身边的朋友，老朋友，包括这几位
布里布里～布里布里～ 开心第一，开心的时候大概率不会互相伤害？其次我相信小新也从未放弃学习！完美的东西让AI去做吧，人类值得拥有不断“犯错”的青春～想起《贝克街的亡灵》，没记错的话里边要杀死精英后代，重构日本，悲伤调子；小新这次里边的侦探队像柯南的侦探小队，“犯人就是……”也很联动了～ 不过设定是反过来，是想让人人成为精英，整体开心。两者都涉及到AI科幻元素……但小新这个是给成人的童话 +科幻啊。不见得只有悲剧是“伟大”的。
看哭，风间最后那段跑好煽情。几次莫名其妙的展开，但跟人设很搭，不得不说小新这几个人的人设，与“自私自利、争风吃醋、憨直卖萌、耍贱逗乐”都可以配合上，而哆啦A梦那边就只能全员正能量，太局限了；侦探线普普通通，而且丢掉了开头的分数设定，扣分，但这个结果太无厘头了，太符合傻乎乎的风格了，无法不爱
原以为是聚在一起演一出新剧情，但只是回顾有点失望，但还是哭了好几次。
“朋友即家人的那段时光” “美好事物终结的时候总会令人伤感”
when good things end, it's sad but it's life
情怀加成太多了[哭] 致敬最美的青春岁月，朋友像家人一样抱团取暖、温暖孤独心灵的年代～美人迟暮令人惋惜，但愿之后别聚了，大家都健健康康的享受无忧生活就最好了。
I will be there for you.
我TMD一个劲的看进度条，看看还剩多少，不是怕看不完，而是怕看完了没得看
“bullshit”
smellycat smellycat what r they feeding u
这是我看的第一部美剧，也是我最喜欢的美剧，想重刷一遍。
I will always love these friends
发布的那天就看了，已经是去年5月底的事情了？好快哦
青春是FIRE!后半段持续发力，燃得热泪盈眶！
阶级划分、精英教育、友情岔路，三位一体，本格推理。用蜡笔小新一行儿童强行嵌套了一个青春燃剧。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
