Somewhere in the remote region, the war ends. In the midst of ruined cities and houses in the streets, in rural hamlets, everywhere where people still live, are children who have lost their homes and parents. Abandoned, hungry, and in rags, defenseless and humiliated, they wander through the world. Hunger drives them. Little streams of orphans merge into a river which rushes forward and submerges everything in its path. The children do not know any feeling; they know only the world of their enemies. They fight, steal, struggle for a mouthful of food, and violence is merely a means to get it. A gang led by Cahoun finds a refuge in an abandoned castle and encounters an old composer who has voluntarily retired into solitude from a world of hatred, treason, and crime. How can they find a common ground, how can they become mutual friends? The castle becomes their hiding place but possibly it will also be their first home which they may organize and must defend. But even for this, the price will be very high.
To this simple story, the journalist, writer, poet, scriptwriter, movie director, and film theoretician Béla Balázs applied many years of experience. He and the director Géza Radványi created a work which opened a new postwar chapter in Hungarian film. Surprisingly, this film has not lost any of its impact over the years, especially on a profound philosophical level. That is to say, it is not merely a movie about war; it is not important in what location and in what period of time it takes place. It is a story outside of time about the joyless fate of children who pay dearly for the cruel war games of adults.
At the time it was premiered, the movie was enthusiastically received by the critics. The main roles were taken by streetwise boys of a children's group who created their roles improvisationally in close contact with a few professional actors, and in the children's acting their own fresh experience of war's turmoil appears to be reflected. At the same time, their performance fits admirably into the mosaic of a very complex movie language. Balázs's influence revealed itself, above all, in the introductory sequences: an air raid on an amusement park, seen in a montage of dramatic situations evoking the last spasms of war, where, undoubtedly, we discern the influence of classical Soviet cinematography. Shooting, the boy's escape, the locomotive's wheels, the shadows of soldiers with submachine guns, the sound of a whistle—the images are linked together in abrupt sequences in which varying shots and expressive sharp sounds are emphasized. A perfectly planned screenplay avoided all elements of sentimentality, time-worn stereotypes of wronged children, romanticism and cheap simplification. The authors succeeded in bridging the perilous dramatic abyss of the metamorphosis of a children's community. Their telling of the story (the scene of pillaging, the assault on the castle, etc) independently introduced some neorealist elements which, at that time, were being propagated in Italy by De Sica, Rossellini, and other film artists. The rebukes of contemporary critics, who called attention to "formalism for its own sake" have been forgotten. The masterly art of cameraman Barnabás Hegyi gives vitality to the poetic images. His angle shots of the children, his composition of scenes in the castle interior, are a living document of the times, and underline the atmosphere and the characters of the protagonists. The success of the picture was also enhanced by the musical art of composer Dénes Buday who, in tense situations, inserted the theme of the Marseilaise into the movie's structure, as a motive of community unification, as an expression of friendship and the possibility of understanding.
Valahol Europaban is the first significant postwar Hungarian film. It originated in a relaxed atmosphere, replete with joy and euphoria, and it includes these elements in order to demonstrate the strength of humanism, tolerance, and friendship. It represents a general condemnation of war anywhere in the world, in any form.
这部连隔夜胖次都好好哭。每一个角色都在闪闪发光
近年来最好的蜡笔小新电影。从op，画风，色彩运用，淡入的介绍，不乱玩设定都可以看出这是诚心之作。
4.0。因为是蜡笔小新，所以永远都会抱有期待。这部当然远算不上蜡笔小新最好的作品，但也算得上上称佳作了。
有一些高概念映射出早已经熟知的现实，有一些作画演出不错，还是老毛病，演不出一个整体精彩的故事，藤原叔也不在了，蜡笔小新怎么都脱不出子供向的阴影，其实它是个青年向作品，人们恐怕都不记得了
2021.3.20 剧情一般，比较儿童化，适合初中生以下看，主角妥妥的小新和他的涂鸦朋友们。小新真是小色批…
蜡笔小新这个IP，或许我们都快忘了蜡笔，只记得小新。
本来做好会很糟糕的准备看的，但今年这部真是超出预期的好看。
还是真的不错，人性刻画得真的很好，一如既往地爱这个五岁的小屁孩
蜡笔用完，小新就从英雄变成了罪恶之源。成人还真的自私又无趣。
有几部分想到现实，沉深沉爱着小新的丰满女人，积极解决问题的内裤，一起画画的决心
吃老本也不用心点，看样子是没东西了，还每年一部，你行吗？
还行吧。这部没啥特别戳我的。唯独看到肥嘟嘟左卫门比较让我开心
蜡笔小新回归之作，这几年最为优秀的剧场版。左卫门重登大电影。无厘头，冒险，感动，童心，蜡笔小新永恒的主题。
还好吧，就是小新独角戏有些多，想看多看些防卫队和野原家的操作
前半部分看的时候困得不行，但到后面泪点不断攻击。“我也救了我自己的老妈，佑马也能找到自己的妈妈，真是太好了。”将心比心，和身后一味责怪的大人鲜明对比，从这里开始，哭到不行。
真是用“低幼”的形式，又骂了一次大人。三星吧。
(7/10)年货虽然不错. 但我还是希望看到大胆的主创. 而不是抓到套路后按部就班.
2021看哭的第一部电影，小新拯救了春日部和涂鸦王国是为了大家，更是为了能和娜娜子姐姐吃饭。不论时代如何变化，不管我们手中拿的是书本还是手机，都要心存美好。孩子们不断长大，童年渐渐远去，希望心中的自由与童真能一直伴我同行。
内裤君牺牲自己弥补缺失的线笑死我了
小新画的三个朋友，其实是小新拥有的品质的实体化。娜娜子的爱和保护，内裤人的聪明，左卫门的自大贪财势利。三人在自我奉献的时候凸显的是小新内心价值观。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
