Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
贾静雯演得好。也许这就是怎么照看这类病人应有的样子。
说明他早就怀疑蝙蝠侠是布鲁斯·韦恩。
开场序幕定调惊艳，然而一路走低，黑色电影质感并不能拯救这样一个毫无悬念感的故事走向，无论探案线索、反派设置还是正义的探讨都拖沓又刻板，三个小时更是大可不必。
想说谢谢导演还算善良给了个痛快，结尾我非常紧张地以为会停留在妈妈盯着屏幕的特写镜头就结束了。就说全球疫情已有两年多，无论是严防死守还是与之共存，所有人的生活都遭遇了不同程度的冲击，心理也承受了许多重压，该有影像作品去描绘和记录以及正视这种改变了。你知道吗？我也听到过那种声音，只不过我的是噼里啪啦的火星爆裂声音。
前半部蓝色的处理让人喜欢。还是只有苦难才会让人相亲相爱，母女的和解还是来源于需要一起面对解决问题。结尾的泄洪，让女儿听到了妈妈的幻听。这样处理多此一举。
6.5 紧扣时代征兆的剧情片，把落点放置于脆弱的中产家庭，以母女关系出发，柔和地表达出声音及隔膜，中规中矩下可窥一斑而见全豹
谜语人叫蝙蝠侠去孤儿院，导致布鲁斯·韦恩不能亲自拆包裹，说明蝙蝠侠和布鲁斯·韦恩是同一个人。
诺兰之后，敢拍蝙蝠侠的，都是真的勇士。事实证明，这勇士水平还不低
万箭穿心后依然可以阳光普照，留下希望总归是温暖的。
892｜3.5，电影带来的情感震荡完全不是人物创造的，而是在情节和观众自身的经验叠加之中产生的。钟孟宏不会写人，他擅长的是捕捉一个个可能产生真挚情感的瞬间，但却对其视而不见，转而用情节上的突转来引导观众。
和阳光普照一样，都是在讲家庭关系，还是更喜欢前者。怎么好好的日子就过成了现在这样。
各種生活細節呈現得很細緻。如果不是太刻意的命題式結尾，本是值五星的作品。
贾静雯是演得好，但导演前半段猛拆楼人生处处下坡路，后半段猛盖楼一切都在好转。这么拍意义有限，触底不反弹才真吧…又想起万箭穿心
对于也在经历the fall的中年人来说，影片几乎把我一年多以来内心的恐惧都表现出来了。五星是为了记住，要好好过下去。
事实证明，DC就是重复自己的deep dark fantasy，也比模仿漫威的合家欢要强多了。
【离婚失业母亲精神分裂，女儿担起照顾责任】《瀑布》的故事灵感来自导演钟孟宏友人发生的真实故事，以电影《瀑布》中层层暗喻与不停撞击两个女主角的故事为设计概念主轴，就有如海报中的草丛，缓缓持续着围绕这着母女，像是保护他们又像是被团团困住。而她们背后的蓝色帏幕象征未完工且令人期待的未来，蓝色的基底又像是层层水幕，大量的水花如瀑布般向下坠落。
摄影一项是钟孟宏的强项，但为什么他这么喜欢让人说金句呢？而且这么多的客串其实是大大降低现实主义力度的。
贾姐牛蛙。前面挺碎片，全片确实从瀑布到溪流，最后结尾很惊喜
三星半，疫情只是导火索，而中产生活宛如幻象如此脆弱，顷刻崩塌。喜欢蛇那段，乍以为病中的胡话，却是惊悚事实。不过贾静雯的表演没有那么惊艳。
2022年了，我们仍在看一部黑暗、压抑、阴冷而又冗长的蝙蝠侠电影
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
