剧情介绍

  这是Richard Lester最好的一个片。
  An absurdist classic
  This is a wonderful surreal comedy based on the play by Spike Milligan and John Antrobus. You know that it is going to be an odd film right at the beginning, when the opening credits list the cast in order of their height. The film begins with the BBC (Frank Thornton) telling us through the facade of an old television that this is the third, or is it the fourth?, anniversary of the shortest war in history, lasting 2 hours and 28 minutes. England is now a barren landscape, littered with derelict cars and buildings, hills of old boots, broken crockery, and other debris. Forty million people perished and there are only 20 known survivors. The Queen did not survive, and of the 20 known survivors the next in line for the throne is a Mrs Ethel Schroake of 393a High Street, Leytonstone. Among the other survivors are Ralph Richardson (O Lucky Man!) as Lord Fortnum of Alamein, who isn't looking forward to his impending mutation into a bed sitting room. Michael Hordern is Bules Martin, who wears a 18-carat Hovis bread ring. Spike Milligan is a postman who wanders around and delivers some memorable dialogue, for example: "And in come the three bears - the daddy bear said, 'Who's been sleeping in my porridge?' - and the mummy bear said, 'that's no porridge, that was my wife' ". Arthur Lowe is slowly turning into a parrot (which is then eaten by Spike Milligan), while his wife, the owner of her own death certificate, turns into a wardrobe. His daughter is pregnant with a strange creature, which she has held inside her for seventeen months. Peter Cook and Dudley Moore are a pair of policemen who perpetually tell the others to "keep moving!". Moore growls a lot and turns into a dog at the end. Marty Feldman is a wellington-boot-wearing nurse. It's a hilarious, absurdist treat, and one of my treasured filmic pleasures.

评论:

  • 九娅童 4小时前 :

    与另一部《偷窥者》同样的题材,但剧情的推进比《偷》要逊色一些,《偷》的反转是蛮惊艳的。还有,本片没有把杀人动机描述清楚,既然之前和死者有过纠纷,就不担心事后警察会联想到而受到怀疑?惊悚的程度还不是特别令人满意。如果有另外一个结局,比如女主精神分裂产生的幻觉,不知道效果又会怎样……

  • 中若兰 7小时前 :

    坏蛋也太像坏蛋了,以及害怕的通常都是真实存在的,这个恶人本身带来的恐惧感远远不及所有人对她说的话嗤之以鼻的态度。

  • 展奇邃 2小时前 :

    运用镜头和色彩很有效的外化出了女性感受到世界,情节略cliche但stupid office joke’那个情节是真的有powerful到。以及,结尾我爱!

  • 应梓颖 4小时前 :

    正经3分片 不多不少 刚好3分 想起留学的时候 卧室也没窗户 但老子当天就去搞了个窗帘 你说气不气😊

  • 怡璐 8小时前 :

    可以说朱丽亚自己不做不死吗?最后结局反转再反转有些出彩,设定和去年的偷窥者有些异曲同工。

  • 天歌阑 5小时前 :

    总有那么些人觉得自己的结婚对象在装疯卖傻🤷🏼‍♂️

  • 仰宾实 7小时前 :

    20年前拍出来还行吧,有句台词不错,接受不确定的生活..

  • 云娅 0小时前 :

    影片大体上中规中矩,这个故事还是比较普通的,就是一个变态窥探+杀人狂跟女主斗智斗勇的故事,剧情的紧张惊悚氛围比较低,偏于平淡,节奏偏慢,也没有反转;不过有一个大的问题,就是女主最后被割喉后,那出血量未免太多了些,床上/衣服上/地上都是血,何况地上还淌了一大摊,即使不死也应该陷于昏迷状态才对,可最后女主竟然站起来,去摸了枪再走到门口打死凶手,这体力真不是一般的强,平时也没看看见女主锻炼身体啊!如果没有这个问题,我会给6.3分,现在只能给3星5.9分,删掉!

  • 师天工 4小时前 :

    🎬🎈

  • 摩晓蕾 8小时前 :

    5.5/10 框架陈旧,故事发展毫无想象力。

  • 宰曼珍 8小时前 :

    作为一部惊悚片,节奏慢到我全程都在感叹公寓布局、装潢以及前半程女主还没慌时的好衣品,太多bug代入不能,首先女主连续多次发现有人偷看不告诉男主,男主不信也不拍照证明,其次男主跟警察去对面求证,回来不说都聊了啥,反而说就算是那个跟踪你的人也不能证明啥,最后为啥监视的女主,却杀了邻居?且明明是割头犯,却不割女主的头,甚至不确定她是否死了就离开,让她反杀。哦对了,也许是因为对面又有人在watch,这部剧应该叫大窗户惹的祸!

  • 后海桃 7小时前 :

    闷。心理元素运用的可以,总体还是比偷窥者要高级

  • 幸芳茵 2小时前 :

    在超市里遇到跟踪狂,不往人多的地方或者收银台走,反而往里面没人的地方躲,是个什么意思?智障?

  • 大柔谨 9小时前 :

    看完有被故事逻辑被鞭挞的感觉,氛围有了,可惜太假。

  • 初楠 6小时前 :

    典型的欧美电影,一大堆bug。莫名奇妙的剧情。

  • 仍永新 0小时前 :

    房子装修挺好看的…男人不管什么时候都是敷衍了事。

  • 房绿蓉 1小时前 :

    还行,氛围和镜头很赞,最后结局虽然有些不合理倒也颇具戏剧性。

  • 卯湛芳 0小时前 :

    真拖沓,不过气氛烘托的还可以。这种女性的视角看着是挺恐惧的,因为中间一段精彩的戏份加一星,结局好拉啊,看到地铁那里的时候,我还以为会结局在地铁里呢,最后这一段就像硬凑的。不过,让男友看到最后的画面在我这有加点分,电影意义有上升。

  • 凡林 6小时前 :

    只有女性才会深深共情这份恐惧,也只有女性能亲手解决掉这份恐惧。

  • 彩颖 6小时前 :

    前面都很好,最后BE也可以啊,为什么要诈尸?不能理解,一头问号

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved