Somewhere in the remote region, the war ends. In the midst of ruined cities and houses in the streets, in rural hamlets, everywhere where people still live, are children who have lost their homes and parents. Abandoned, hungry, and in rags, defenseless and humiliated, they wander through the world. Hunger drives them. Little streams of orphans merge into a river which rushes forward and submerges everything in its path. The children do not know any feeling; they know only the world of their enemies. They fight, steal, struggle for a mouthful of food, and violence is merely a means to get it. A gang led by Cahoun finds a refuge in an abandoned castle and encounters an old composer who has voluntarily retired into solitude from a world of hatred, treason, and crime. How can they find a common ground, how can they become mutual friends? The castle becomes their hiding place but possibly it will also be their first home which they may organize and must defend. But even for this, the price will be very high.
To this simple story, the journalist, writer, poet, scriptwriter, movie director, and film theoretician Béla Balázs applied many years of experience. He and the director Géza Radványi created a work which opened a new postwar chapter in Hungarian film. Surprisingly, this film has not lost any of its impact over the years, especially on a profound philosophical level. That is to say, it is not merely a movie about war; it is not important in what location and in what period of time it takes place. It is a story outside of time about the joyless fate of children who pay dearly for the cruel war games of adults.
At the time it was premiered, the movie was enthusiastically received by the critics. The main roles were taken by streetwise boys of a children's group who created their roles improvisationally in close contact with a few professional actors, and in the children's acting their own fresh experience of war's turmoil appears to be reflected. At the same time, their performance fits admirably into the mosaic of a very complex movie language. Balázs's influence revealed itself, above all, in the introductory sequences: an air raid on an amusement park, seen in a montage of dramatic situations evoking the last spasms of war, where, undoubtedly, we discern the influence of classical Soviet cinematography. Shooting, the boy's escape, the locomotive's wheels, the shadows of soldiers with submachine guns, the sound of a whistle—the images are linked together in abrupt sequences in which varying shots and expressive sharp sounds are emphasized. A perfectly planned screenplay avoided all elements of sentimentality, time-worn stereotypes of wronged children, romanticism and cheap simplification. The authors succeeded in bridging the perilous dramatic abyss of the metamorphosis of a children's community. Their telling of the story (the scene of pillaging, the assault on the castle, etc) independently introduced some neorealist elements which, at that time, were being propagated in Italy by De Sica, Rossellini, and other film artists. The rebukes of contemporary critics, who called attention to "formalism for its own sake" have been forgotten. The masterly art of cameraman Barnabás Hegyi gives vitality to the poetic images. His angle shots of the children, his composition of scenes in the castle interior, are a living document of the times, and underline the atmosphere and the characters of the protagonists. The success of the picture was also enhanced by the musical art of composer Dénes Buday who, in tense situations, inserted the theme of the Marseilaise into the movie's structure, as a motive of community unification, as an expression of friendship and the possibility of understanding.
Valahol Europaban is the first significant postwar Hungarian film. It originated in a relaxed atmosphere, replete with joy and euphoria, and it includes these elements in order to demonstrate the strength of humanism, tolerance, and friendship. It represents a general condemnation of war anywhere in the world, in any form.
都是融梗感觉还不如月球陨落，这电影老套到感觉不像21世纪的产物。。。。
你会死，我会死，死就死。我们就是他的光，我们就是他的希望。带我回家
同类型的喜剧商业性不如不要抬头，科幻性不如火星救援，沙丘，流浪地球。bug太多，满片子家国情怀，全是赢麻了，边看边叹气。
喜剧片为什么要悲剧结尾啊…我真的不想哭，就结尾太失望了。冲着腾哥去的，没想要哭着结束。
这算是开心麻花稳定发挥吧，里面有的东西跟预想的一样，有搞笑的，有故意煽情的，有加爱情，反正就是很商业。在国内最顶级的特效团队的加持下，我觉得还是可以的
2022.7.29 好笑！刚好前几天刷到说pi算到三十八万位 如果无穷无尽说明我们不是虚拟的人
国产电影从来没有过这种类型，这是一个很好的开始，科幻喜剧，只是是国产科幻我都支持
可以说既满足了观众对于喜剧片欢乐属性的要求，又满足了观众对科幻片视觉盛宴的需求，不管你喜欢哪种类型片子，总有一种适合你。
最后加句抖机灵式的评论，独孤月最终为什么回不到地球，而金刚鼠却能回去，可能导演想表达一厢情愿的感情，最后一般都得死吧…
作为一个跟开心麻花相性不合的观众难得觉得观感还不错，应该是说是张吃鱼还不错。很多情节的处理没有掉进麻花的老套路，沈腾虽然越来越邋遢，但是不油了。李玟找对了，东北马丽直接变成了台北Mary。
遗落月球很悲催，一人一鼠相依偎。临危授命救家园，灵魂相伴爱人归
独孤月在月球上的“积极”生活给了地球上的人们希望，独孤月绝望时，幸存者们又给予了独孤月生存的希望，相互支撑救赎的感情，看到起鸡皮疙瘩
会有那种比较恶俗的烂梗，但是好看的！会笑着哭（难怪是国内拍，就韩国哪拍的出这个啊）
在“这也太假了这也叫科幻”和“算了吧它是个喜剧不用那么严谨”之间徘徊。男女主人物关系让我想到云天明和程心。
特效画面、配乐、演技、笑点、燃点，月球真是啥都不缺，巨好看无比！
和刘亦濛在电影院看的第十三部，这个暑假第一部（也许是唯一一部？）IMAX。第一次看到开心麻花的喜剧片以悲剧结尾？
3.5星。尬的地方太尬（比如袋鼠出现后的前40分钟），有些情节非常不科学不物理。然而开头和结尾的2分钟动画还不错（谁做的定格好可爱！），以及月面滑板+宇宙里的个人英雄主义太浪漫了我大声哭泣😭
虚伪而自恋，幸存者是陪衬，女性是附庸，全部让渡给了，英雄拯救世界，牺牲小我成就大我，自我感动的舞台。机械化缺乏细节的主角形象，模板化按部就班的笑点，牺牲的命令不由上级做出不用女主传达，让主角自己听到并毫无转折立刻接受。看完念念不忘的是，那两个喊着我不信后被消失的路人，究竟是在讽刺还只是在当做笑点。
很有想象力很新颖的科幻喜剧片，不错的爆米花电影
喜剧里最科幻的，科幻片里最好笑的。但也因因为喜剧科幻接近五五开的比例，少了一些科幻细节铺垫，可以补补原作韩漫。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
