Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
虽然还是超英版但这次故事好好哭呜呜呜呜 同期五人组太帅了叭 人物塑造好绝太牛了
看得我心酸。哎，这个温柔敏感奇怪又酷的小孩啊。亲人之间奇特的爱与联结。世界上人和人之间的联结，无数的问题，小孩子的视野和想法。人文中带着一点失落和伤心。我很喜欢这部电影。
关于从孩子身上学到的那些事情 用文本构建出一个社会 试图去消解孩子与大人 大人与大人 大人与城市的巴别塔 小朋友值得一个最佳男配。
很好看！每次都有不同的感动，不同的惊喜，超爱安室透！
前半段我觉得在侮辱我的常识，后半段则是在侮辱我的智商。给一颗星吧
现实许多地点或情形见不到这种洞悉人性的小孩儿。
结尾万圣节灯笼啪塔啪塔掉下来的时候，那个画面感真的是爱了~~
非常平淡，但实际挺治愈的一部电影，最近也在思考有一个自己孩子是怎样的感受，结论是确实可能想象不出来，至少电影给了一种不错的可能
好久没有看这么有流逝感的作品了，不记得第一次看到语音旁白和无声影像结合的片段是在哪里。看前面以为是讲孤独的，全看完发现只猜对了三分之一不到。兄妹、母子、叔侄(忘年挚友)以及夫妻，构成牢固三角和一线段的图形关系。四个点都有自己的问题，他们在一定程度上怯于表达真实情感，逃、躲、假装无视、敷衍差点毁掉宝贵的亲密关系。然而他们没有放弃，在信任、试探、发泄、原谅之后加增了爱，它或许来自血缘但超越了它。访谈内容巧妙地引导和呼应着主线剧情(同时也喜欢疑似是树叶夹带的私货)。严重怀疑饰演Jesse的小男孩是本色出演，太太太自然了，倒显得其他所有人都不够“去雕饰”了。眼泪自己涌出来两次，具体位置不记得了。
如何和孩子相处，成人之间的交流方法用在孩子身上时完全失效，你生气你愤怒恨不得打TA。为什么一定要跟我对着干。
at新宿TOHO。犯人太好猜，足球戏份太多，搜查一课每天这又都是在干啥呀，我要是日本纳税人看了都要落泪。但是警校组的回忆部分还是太喜欢了，我们hiro太帅气太帅气，全程都在“哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈？”和“诸伏景光你带我走吧！”的心情间反复。以及来自朋友的概括：囚禁 眼罩 项圈 不明液体的碰撞。不过没有强行给犯人扯出一个动机倒也算是进步。虽然这么讲还是很期待小哀主场的M26。
远景摄影非常有一套 舒适
导演很会拍温暖动情的故事，Joaquin Phoenix自带艺术气质，演绎这个角色也是信手拈来，但整体感受还是一般了，缺乏亮点。
这部剧场版做的比上部好，我个人觉得推理部分还比较缜密
Nothing to do with the movie
先打个五星表示一下期待，啥时候能在大陆引进哇
难道我不会吗？
完全是以前没有过的感觉，新鲜感很足喜欢～不过小柯一年比一年离谱的道具还是2333
近年最佳！动作戏看的真的爽，明年希望揭秘琴酒的过往，他是怎么成为杀手的
黑白色调加上穿插纪录片形式是对味的，透过一大一小的对话流露出对当今社会的深层忧虑，但整个过程有些缺乏情感，只是打着亲情和孩童旗号探讨严肃议题，成年人的心机是藏不住的。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
