Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
很Liam Neilson的电影，为啥不叫《记忆营救》啊？他的片子都和“营救“有关，老年痴呆唤醒杀手的良知，开始寻找救赎，故事还不错
前四分之一的时候看到连姆尼森记忆出现偏差，以为会切入到“到底是不是我杀的”的心理悬疑风，不过看完全片发现阿尔兹海默症实际上只是发挥了一点点的“给杀手起绊子”的作用。不过从医学角度看，本片也确实能够稍微推动大众对阿尔兹海默症这一神经退行性病变疾病的认知，起到科普和关怀的作用。可怜连姆尼森，从大叔走向老爷子，电影呈现出短期记忆的丧失这一方式更是精细且近距离地让观众体会到除了“廉颇老矣”之外，阿尔兹海默症是如何慢慢吞噬掉一个人的。
6.5分。比Liam Neeson前面几部作品来得要好些，整体表现还算在线吧。比较套路化，但也还能看。比较悲哀的是Monica Bellucci真的是好显老，有点吃不住角色的感觉。再加上Guy Pearce，三杆老枪一台戏，果然岁月是把杀猪刀呢。。。最后结尾感觉收不住了所以搞个略带机械降神味道的割喉，总觉得有些不是味道。
想看看玛莱娜22年时的容颜，却被连姆连森的廉颇老矣击中，各种心酸难耐。唉，俺也过40了哦。
黑道想用白道的方式解决问题，然后白道用黑道的方式解决了问题？
好在结局没像《守法公民》那样恶心，手刃反派大快人心。你腐蚀法律，我也能钻法律的空子。
剧情：坏人都得死。大叔这么大岁数了还要演这种批量式电影，但是还是可以看下去的
现在是老年痴呆 下一部是不是要在轮椅上拍了.
剧情还算可以吧，老杀手没执行杀13岁小女孩而成了被杀的对象……
对欧美人脸盲，搞这么多人物，我都不认识谁是谁；说是动作片，却整这么多台词，废话多的不得了。电影整体相当一般，要不是喜欢连姆尼森老爷子，三星都不会给。
一个即将退休的老年痴呆杀手，在生命的最后觉悟了要惩恶扬善，然后连智商和命都不要了？
男主本有机会可以走的，砸下一块金子可以跟那辆路过的车一起走，贪婪的欲望永无止境。他更没有想到一个才认识不到两天的同伙会等他耗死在那里自己再独吞，我都想到了，这点挺不符合逻辑
对欧美人脸盲，搞这么多人物，我都不认识谁是谁；说是动作片，却整这么多台词，废话多的不得了。电影整体相当一般，要不是喜欢连姆尼森老爷子，三星都不会给。
抓坏人永远抓不到的，抓好人一抓一个准，连叔迷途知返为未成年儿童发声直接杀掉他们，危害我们的儿童的那帮畜生呢为什么不杀了他们
看完才发现是马丁·坎贝尔作品，动作片大咖一直在线。老尼森的硬汉本色终于有了些新意。痴呆症健忘不如杀的干脆，死的随性！只可惜了贝鲁奇那杯红酒。
沙漠的残酷让人对一切都产生了幻觉，在任何极端的环境下，活下去就是最大的成功。
虽然知道是烂片，还是会看，谁让喜欢的演员在里面呢，叔的电影是看一部少一部
我确实不太知道马丁坎贝尔这波在讲什么东西 跟龙叔英伦对决差太多了吧也，还是剧本的问题，松松散散的
其实挺好的，可以一直看下去。这应该是连姆尼森近年来接的最好的一部电影了。很奇怪评分那么低。莫妮卡贝鲁奇真是永远的女神！
额，看了容易忘的电影，难以remember系列…
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
