Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
费里尼大概是学不来的吧，狂欢不只是热闹，可以拷贝疯癫叔叔/小姨，拷贝火车站的孩子，拷贝教父问你是否需要告解，但没有费里尼般充满大爱的心，怕是描不出那种丰腴的人物质地，也挥不出那种神圣的激情和能量
近期去看的所有电影里最不会出错的电影，老少皆宜。
大概90年代是美国人最难忘，最缅怀，最得意的年代，所以这部片从画面到剧情，甚至调度、结构都是满屏的考古味。
能感受到片子想在画风上走一点蜘蛛侠平行宇宙的那种漫画式的画风。但是又做的不够极致，所以导致最后的效果有些迷。有些地方甚至像渲染没设置好的粗糙样片。
7/10。在模仿了《低俗小说》的开场戏，大坏狼与贪吃蛇坐在餐厅里闲聊，桌上放着的报纸刊登了他们的罪行，随着他们起身离开，镜头扫到扎堆躲在墙角的顾客，标志着动物（人形特征）与人类的对立，接着抢银行后驾驶汽车的大坏狼叫观众靠近并介绍自己的反派身份，借由第四堵墙的打破强调了人类对动物/文明对野性的审视态度。黛安狐作为被文明认可的政治精英与金海豚所象征的理想道德，意在贬低坏蛋们对自身叛逆形象的认同，但讽刺的是坏蛋们之所以盗物失败，是获得了他人道德的认同：大坏狼无意中帮助了橘子酱教授伪装的老妇人，得到感谢后大坏狼无意识地摇起尾巴，这个自我的逆转更直接体现在大坏狼救猫的视频被广泛传播，由此可见个人的善恶传达要从他人的审视中获得满足，大资本家（橘子酱教授）正是掌握了‘‘好人’’的社会表演法才能够掩饰犯罪企图。
22#坏蛋联盟 2022.05.08
流畅的爆米花，三星半。（欧美这类爆米花动画，我看过后一周内就会忘记剧情）
願意付票房的好爆米花，狼叔狐姐痞帥，搞笑橋段也挺多。
芜湖！蛮好看的！故事节奏和歌都好听～甚至觉得比速度与激情飙车有看头～～（坐我旁旁旁边的哥每次蜘蛛放歌的时候他头就会跟着动，抱歉我余光真的看见了，擦汗
其实是罗汉系列的变体，剧情不并独特，但笑点和人物塑造还是很不错。
似乎是少年成长故事，全场百分之八十都是老年观众（你瓣迷影口味重哦）
审美在线，就是有点无聊。
4.5 前半部分观感异常之好，意料之外情理之中的情节和画面让人拍案叫绝，扔橘子之类都是神来之笔，直到医院都是大师级场面调度，既远且近、目不暇接；意外发生之后密度骤然降低，虽然偶有像与男爵夫人做爱这种惊人段落，但还是难免陷入某种“挨个见面”的固定节奏之中（总觉得走私犯和导演可以更精彩），失掉了一点《绝美之城》的韵律之美和升华空间。若比之《阿玛柯德》肯定还是差了一口气，但也不妨碍远远超过金狮奖《正发生》……还有一个变量：需大银幕重看重评
追求当好人的感觉所以坏人变成了好人
人物脸谱化还是比较严重，还是熟悉的套路。山姆罗克韦尔的声音还是很有辨识度的，最后拍拍小豚鼠的那个动作，真有魅力
虽然卡通化了 但我看见这么多鼠科聚集 我还是惶恐了……
纷华靡丽的镜头下费里尼式人物还有86年的时代记忆，无疑是索伦蒂诺等到了能够离内心自我有一段距离的时机，带着自传性质的身影重现那段时光。但会不会在Fabietto这个人物下多了一份空虚和不那么讨喜的为所欲为呢？
索伦蒂诺为什么能火无疑是本世纪欧洲影坛最大谜团。让我想起了血气方刚的少年时代爱不释手的那本杂志：《萌芽》。
还行，比之前的坏蛋变好人的动画片强一点点。
2.5 前半段高仿阿玛柯德还不错，中段转折后感觉已经看过很多类似成长/乡愁电影，导致并没有任何记忆点/特点，换个意大利导演来拍估计也能拍出差不多的东西，看完既忘。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
