Synopsis
"Falsely accused as the murderer of my own husband... Oh, the cruel machinations of fate!" A female teacher (Lee Yong-ae) gives shelter to an escaped convict, but her husband, misconstruing her intentions, reacts violently and accidentally stabs himself to death in the process. The teacher is charged with her husband's murder, but fortunately the prosecutor on the case is a former student of hers, of whom she had taken painstaking care when she was working at an elementary school. Remembering her kindness to him, the prosecutor uncovers her innocence in court, and she is acquitted of the crime.
Notes
"A silent movie that allows us to examine the narrator-accompanied method of 16mm films" (Chung Jong-wha)
A Public Prosecutor and a Teacher is familiar to us for the performance of Shin Chool, Korea's last silent movie narrator (known as "byeonsa"in Korean). Numerous critics have recommended the film, praising it as "a silent movie that allows us to examine the narrator-accompanied method of 16mm films" (Chung Jong-wha), "the work of Korea's last silent movie narrator" (Kim Hong-joon), a movie that "reflects the public's consciousness and has great historical value" (Lee Seung-hun), and "the archetypal new-school film" (Chung Sung-il). As evidenced by such commentary, A Public Prosecutor and a Teacherenjoys greater recognition for its historical value as the only surviving silent movie in Korea than for its artistic or technical aspects. What is ironic is the fact that this recognition derivesfrom a production and screening method that fell behind the times, as sound films (or "talkies") had already become the norm when the movie was first made. Its inclusion in the list is therefore based on its historical, social context rather than on the film itself.
Afterword:
- Narrated by Shin Chool, who is known as Korea's last silent film narrator, A Public Prosecutor and a Teacherhas been screened at several film festivals since the latter half of the 1990s.
无论是什么时代 无论是什么统治制度 如果大多数人民都到了穷尽一切办法都难以活下去的地步 那便是天翻地覆 江山改易 所以 为什么一定要走到这一步呢
中国也有，别装理中客了，摸摸良心吧，总有一天你们会需要的，铁拳之下众生都是刍狗。
真相大概从警察说出犯人越狱的时候就知道了，但是丝毫不影响观看。
电影的价值与意义 没有追求的生活有什么意思
跟误杀瞒天记有一样的警察腐败的背景 那样的社会 真是看一次无语一次
杰伊比姆实则是一种为平等而斗争的精神。
尽管有诸多理想主义的爽文套路（比如坏人都蠢，好人一路顺利），但大概也是因为狱中逼供的场景已经足够给人留下心理阴影，权衡之下放弃了一部分真实的黑暗
电影是强大的武器，但重要的是我们通过使用它来保护谁......
印度政府怎么能让这种电影过审？正义得以伸张的核心除了权力外的民权律师，还有权力内的警察处处长：”为了警察部门我什么都可以放到一边，但是我永远不会放弃我的良心，我很抱歉。“
個人觀影史第1624部。在韓國已經把直面直白地揭露制度黑暗的題材拍得家常便飯的時候，印度這邊不但沒讓人覺得這類作品爛大街，還添加了一絲性感（當然也離不開男主角律師本身就長得性感帥氣這一事實）。其實我在想的是，維護公道的過程中，聰明和正直缺一不可——不正直沒那個願心維護公道，不聰明沒那個能力維護公道。行善和公益一樣，看似門檻低，實則門檻極高。
而是一个名叫钱德鲁的律师。
印度的种姓制度是用鲜血铺垫的
拍得振奋人心，正义终将胜利，印度的电影剧本越来越好，也越来越关注现实，真正的再将生活呈现，寻求改变进步🐂🍺
“魔鬼并不存在，而是人创造出来的，那肯定是人按照自己的模样创造的”。
真实人物事件改编，集悬疑、律政、犯罪等几大类型片元素于一炉，俨然可与韩国的《辩护人》媲美，揭露了延续千年的种姓制度对达利特人的戕害，以及背后的官官相护、政治交易、司法腐败等乱象，前现代国家为了维持基层秩序的高压统治，在缺乏足够的刑侦手段时动用刑讯逼供制造冤假错案，随意栽赃迫害贱民，营造高破案率的假象，为警方高层制造跻身政坛的敲门砖，视最基本的人权于无物，作为对立面的正面化身是集良心、智慧、高贵与正义于一身的人权律师钱德鲁，以及被他感召下秉公执法的调查警察，最后真相大白，还远冤死者一个公道。这种编剧方式类似于爽剧的套路，被极度简化成了律师的正义感与邪恶的对决，远非事实真相的全部，但是仅就电影而言，故事曲折离奇，情节跌宕起伏，人物形象鲜明，观感相当娴熟流畅。
此时不想讨论叙事，类型，技法，形式……
无论什么制度，最终都要靠人的良心和说真话。
印度又一部超级震撼的电影，题材火爆，节奏把握严丝合缝，虽然带有一定的理想主义色彩，但思想性极其深刻，印度电影已经在引领世界电影的走向了。
“我常以为是众生普渡了佛祖”“杰伊比姆是成千上万人的泪珠”
来看看世界各国影视制作的突飞猛进！特别是印度这类第三世界国家！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
