Synopsis
Do-seong (Yoo Min) is a child monk who lives at a small mountain temple with the head monk (Byeon Ki-jong), learning the teachings of Buddha. He becomes attached to a young widow (Choi Eun-hee) who comes to pray at the temple, and the childless widow entreats the head monk to let her raise Do-seong as her own son. Conflict ensues when Do-seong's real mother (Kim Seon-young) appears, but she leaves the temple for the sake of her son's future. On the day the widow is to take the child down from the mountain, the head monk discovers that Do-seong has killed a bird by ensnaringit in a trap and decides not to let the boy go into the secular world. When Do-seong finds out that his real mother has been to the temple, he sets out to find her.
Notes
"A film that has garnered recognition for its cinematography and direction by eliminating sentimentality and unaffectedly capturing the quiet life of a mountain temple. A Hometown in Heart demonstrates the camera technique and directorial skill of movies that appeared after the liberation of Korea."
A Hometown in Heart, adapted from playwright Ham Se-deok's A Little Monk (Dong-seung), was hailed upon its release as "a masterpiece that marked a new pinnacle in Korean moviemaking after the liberation." Eschewing new-school sentimentality to quietly express a boy's longing for maternal love, the film unfolds the everyday lives of three generationsthe head monk, a young monk, and a little child monkagainst the backdrop of a quiet temple in the mountains. The long shots utilized by director of cinematography Han Hyung-mo to capture the beautiful scenery of the mountain temple from a distance received great critical acclaim at the time. Also, each of the film's characters is convincingly portrayed through the skillful direction of Yoon Yong-kyu. In particular, the scene which expresses Do-seong's desperate yearning for a mother's love and his birth mother's past visit to the temple by combining them into a dream sequence reveals deep consideration for articulating story and emotion via a compressed visual grammar without tending toward sentimentalism. The movie's final scene, in which Do-seong awakens from his dream and sets off down the path in search of his mother, is both touching and beautiful. The film also features Choi Eun-hee, in the part of the young widow who warmly embraces Do-seong with her love, in one of her first roles.
Afterword:
- Lee Kang-su, writing under the pseudonym of Kwak Il-byeong, first adapted playwright Ham Se-deok's A Little Monk (Dong-seung) into a screenplay, which was then shot for the silver screen with additional embellishments by the director.
但是作爲喜劇笑點真的一般般
如果所有孤儿组成一个国家，将是世界上人口第二多的国家
美国夫妇用自己的特权买印度女孩的身体、健康…真的被赤裸裸的交易恶心到。🤢
不行，多烂也得给我拍完，第四部第一秒就给我拍世纪大战谢谢
啊这我真的万万没想到神乎其神的血盟大战最后是以这么一个基情四射的方式结束的。。。感觉三星都多给了
说真的，随便从霍格沃茨选一个课程（魔法史除外）拍两个小时的录播课拿电影院一播都比这好看13倍🙄️。以及麒麟下跪认王这个设定确定不是偷《十二国记》吗？？？
感动。也许，自己的传承真的并不需要有血缘关系。
最近印度片讨论人权的越来越多了，四星推荐。
无聊的夏日午后，手捧pad克服困倦聚精会神从看到尾的影片，有被惊艳到！故事中每一次反转，每一个镜头的承接都很讲究；每一个人物都很有看头，值得玩味。影片中有句话大概是这样：每个人的人生都是一条奔腾的暗河，任凭你怎样努力，都不可能在最美好的时候停住…把刑侦片拍成文艺片，文艺片拍的悬疑感十足，很是佩服！
来都来了，为什么不告诉我邓布利多和格林德沃为啥相爱。(不要用年少无知敷衍我)。
每次看印度电影都挺惊喜的
实属灾难，这个系列就此收手吧！大卫耶茨他原本只是懂个屁的叙事，这次连视觉效果都屁都不懂了。前两部虽然也是叙事混乱，但至少还能留下不少值得玩味的人物线索和魔法世界独有的视觉奇观，而这部有个什么鬼东西？虽有140分钟的时长，但根本上什么东西都没有讲；作为商业电影在视听上没有任何能让观众享受的点，作为HP的衍生作品对人物和魔法世界的塑造都毫无推进。还有就是大卫耶茨的所谓“个人表达”，人人都是谜语人，台词不要明着说，给你个镜头让你自己猜；在这种人物动机十分混乱的剧本之下实属恶心到了，整个观影过程如坐针毡。最后，邓布利多的秘密是什么？这么长的时间里，所有角色没有任何成长，观众对任何角色的认知也毫无新的增长，第二部结尾时什么样这一部结尾时还是一个样；邓布利多的秘密就是复读前两部的台词，就这就这就这就这？？？
“孩子没有缺陷，是你们有缺陷”。资本主义国家如此讲究人权，讲究自由，却对代孕这个敏感话题置之不理，真的是让人贻笑大方，相信像印度这样的国家代孕之风十分盛行，但这终究其实是对人权的一种侮辱和一种践踏，尤其是当在还在代孕妈妈的肚子里时，相信孩子有缺陷从而放弃了孩子，当孩子出生后又回来认亲，从代孕妈妈身边带走，这真的是一个文明社会享受高等教育的人能干出来的事吗？电影虽然是一部喜剧，却有十分现实的教育意义，四星好评～
代孕牵扯很多道德伦理问题。
又玩儿德三梗，可我觉得德三都比你们魔法世界民主...
就……除了基情和服装没什么亮点，麒麟下跪和小闪找爸爸都尴尬死了……邓布利多家也就剩阿不福思一个能背锅了是吧所以是他，不过演员的美颜可圈可点吸溜
笑死，魔法世界选话事人居然用如此方便造假的方式，造假的人又造得如此不走心，难怪诸位这么牛逼都干不过人类社会，看来上帝打开了魔法之门就关上了智商之窗是真的
孩子不是亲生的也可以做孩子的父母，无论皮肤 不谈种族，不是亲生胜过亲生！
开头那一幕对话，以为非法营运机构，再以为贩卖少女，结果是代孕，好家伙真敢拍！
这电影好像讲了些什么，又好像什么都没讲……
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
